Apakah itu ambiguitas hingga intensionalitas dalam kerangka Near-side pragmatics dan Far-side pragmatics?

 Berikut penjelasan ambiguitas hingga intensionalitas dalam kerangka Near-side pragmatics dan Far-side pragmatics secara jelas, runtut, dan mudah dipahami.

Near-side pragmatics berfokus pada bagaimana konteks membantu menentukan “apa yang sebenarnya dikatakan” secara literal, sedangkan far-side pragmatics berfokus pada apa yang dilakukan dan disiratkan “melampaui” apa yang dikatakan itu sendiri. Dalam perjalanan dari ambiguitas menuju intensionalitas, keduanya membentuk satu kontinua: dari pemilahan makna literal yang meragukan sampai penafsiran niat komunikatif yang lebih dalam.scirp+3​

Near-side pragmatics dan ambiguitas

• Near-side pragmatics menangani persoalan teknis seperti penyelesaian ambiguitas (lexical, struktural), ke-vague-an, referensi kata ganti, nama diri, deiksis, serta sebagian aspek presuposisi.plato.stanford+2​

• Di sini, konteks dipakai untuk menentukan proposisi literal: misalnya kalimat “I saw a star” harus diputuskan apakah merujuk ke bintang di langit atau selebriti, sehingga ambiguitas dipersempit sebelum makna implikatif dibahas.study+1​

Far-side pragmatics dan intensionalitas

• Far-side pragmatics mengurus apa yang terjadi setelah “apa yang dikatakan” sudah ditetapkan: jenis tindak tutur apa yang dilakukan, implikatur apa yang timbul, dan bagaimana sikap, keyakinan, serta tujuan penutur dibaca dari ujaran.john.jperry+2​

• Di ranah ini, intensionalitas (keterarahan ujaran pada maksud komunikatif tertentu) menjadi pusat analisis: penafsir berupaya merekonstruksi niat, sikap, dan tujuan penutur di balik bentuk linguistik yang sudah tidak ambigu secara literal.onlinelibrary.wiley+1​

Dari ambiguitas ke intensionalitas

• “Dari ambiguitas hingga intensionalitas” menggambarkan lintasan interpretasi: pertama-tama penyimak menyelesaikan ambiguitas dan menentukan proposisi literal (tugas near-side), lalu beralih menafsirkan niat, implikatur, dan efek tindak tutur (tugas far-side).vdu+2​

• Ambiguitas bisa juga digunakan secara sengaja (intentional ambiguity) sebagai strategi pragmatik: penutur sengaja mempertahankan multi-makna untuk mencapai tujuan kesantunan, persuasi, atau humor, sehingga transisi dari bentuk ambigu ke pembacaan niat menjadi titik krusial antara near-side dan far-side pragmatics.ijlll+2

Prof Jumanto getting along with Michael Haugh, Brown & Levinson

The 19th International Pragmatics Conference (IPrA 2025) was successfully held at the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia, from 22 to 27 June 2025. The conference brought together scholars, researchers, and practitioners from around the world to discuss the latest developments in pragmatics—the study of language in use and communication in social contexts. With the theme focused on language, interaction, and global diversity, the event featured keynote lectures, plenary sessions, panel discussions, workshops, and hundreds of parallel paper presentations covering areas such as discourse analysis, conversation analysis, sociopragmatics, intercultural communication, applied linguistics, cognitive pragmatics, and new directions in pragmatics research. 

The conference served not only as a forum to present cutting-edge research, but also as an international networking hub that fostered interdisciplinary collaboration between academics, educators, and graduate students. Participants also enjoyed various cultural and academic exchange activities, including campus tours and an official conference reception showcasing Australian hospitality. The success of IPrA 2025 reaffirmed the conference’s role as a major global platform for advancing the understanding of language in real-world interaction.

Prof Jumanto, the President of Indonesian Pragmatics Association was getting along with Brown & Levinson.

Prof Jumanto, the President of INa-Pra was getting along with Michael Haugh, the President of IPrA (International Pragmatics Association).

The Profile of Dr. Saira Kazmi, Ph.D.

Dr. Saira Kazmi, Ph.D. is a Pakistani linguist and communication scholar recognized for her contributions to media discourse and critical linguistics. She currently serves as a Visiting Assistant Professor at Riphah International University and Quaid-i-Azam University, both located in Islamabad, Pakistan. Over the years, she has established herself as an active academic and researcher whose work bridges linguistics, media studies, and discourse analysis within both local and international contexts.

Dr. Kazmi obtained her Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Linguistics with a specialization in Media Discourse from the Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM). Her doctoral research and subsequent academic pursuits have focused on the study of language, power, and ideology in news and public communication. Her scholarly interests cover a wide range of areas including Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), Attitude and Appraisal Analysis, and the linguistic representation of social realities in media and public discourse.

Beyond her teaching and research roles, Dr. Kazmi is deeply engaged in editorial and reviewing activities across multiple international journals. She is an active reviewer for the Journal of Linguistics, Culture and Communication (JOLCC) and also collaborates with several academic platforms and journals such as the Parole Journal of Linguistics and Education, the Register Journal (UIN Salatiga, Indonesia), and INSPAD – Institute of Peace and Development. Her editorial and reviewing work reflects her commitment to advancing the quality of linguistic and communication research, particularly within South Asia’s scholarly community.

In addition to her university and journal affiliations, Dr. Kazmi maintains a professional presence within several regional and global organizations. She has been recognized by ScienceFather, an international research organization, as one of the Best Researcher Award recipients in the field of Politics and Media (ScienceFather Profile). Her published and ongoing works often explore issues of cross-cultural communication, linguistic identity, and the interplay between discourse, politics, and gender.

Dr. Kazmi’s digital researcher identifiers further attest to her active engagement in scholarly publishing. Her Scopus Author ID is 57211395994, and her ORCID ID is 0000-0003-1306-8381. She can also be contacted through her academic email address, saira.asad2011@gmail.com, which is cited in several publications and news features (Nation, 2025).

While some publicly available sources have mentioned her involvement with organizations such as Elsevier BV, Better Morrow Magazine, and South Asia Magazine, these affiliations have not yet been independently verified through formal institutional records. Nonetheless, her confirmed roles in Pakistani and Southeast Asian academic institutions highlight her as a key emerging figure in critical linguistics, media studies, and cross-cultural communication research in the region.

The Profile of Prof. Dr. Drs. JUMANTO, M.Pd. Ina-PrA President

 

Prof. Dr. Drs. JUMANTO, M.Pd. 

Ina-PrA President

Prof. Dr. Drs. Jumanto (commonly known simply as Jumanto) earned his Doctorate (PhD) in Linguistics from Universitas Indonesia in 2006. He is a Professor of Humanities, specializing in English Language Teaching (ELT) and Linguistics (Pragmatics), teaching at graduate and postgraduate levels since 1992.

His latest appointment is as Director of the Center of Excellence (CoE) at Universitas Dian Nuswantoro (UDINUS). From 2016 to 2021, he served as Head of the English Department, Faculty of Humanities, UDINUS, Indonesia.

As a Professor of Humanities, his research interests include ELT, pragmatics, discourse analysis, semiotics, translation practices, Cross-Cultural Understanding (CCU), Cross-Cultural Misunderstanding (CCmU or cultural shock), and verbal and nonverbal communication. He is currently working on projects including (1) Discourse, Context, and Text; (2) Distant and Close Language in the Indonesian context as well as within English-speaking interpersonal contexts; and (3) Character Language Projects, especially focusing on Indonesian, Javanese, and English languages.

For his academic records and identifiers, see:

1. Scopus ID: 57200086067

2. Google Scholar profile: Jumanto on Google Scholar Google Scholar

3. UDINUS staff profile (with NIDN, email, etc.): Prof. Dr. Drs. Jumanto – UDINUS Portal portal.dinus.ac.id

4. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0963-8970

PegiatJurnal.com: List Jurnal Terindeks SCOPUS Bidang Linguistics, E...

PegiatJurnal.com: List Jurnal Terindeks SCOPUS Bidang Linguistics, E...: Yang pernah S3 di Indonesia atau yang sekarang sedang S3 di Indonesia sedikit banyak terkena kewajiban ini. Dorongan yang masif dan terkesan...

COMMUNICATIVE FUNCTIONS AND DELIVERANCE STRATEGIES OF WANGSALAN IN JAVANESE SONG LYRICS

COMMUNICATIVE FUNCTIONS AND DELIVERANCE STRATEGIES OF WANGSALAN IN JAVANESE SONG LYRICS

I Dewa Putu Wijana

Faculty of Cultural Sciences Gadjah Mada University

putu.wijana@ugm.ac.id

Abstract

This study deals with wangsalan found in Javanese song lyrics with attention focus on their communicative functions and deliverance strategies. By using very small amount of data of Javanese songs exploiting wangsalan, it is found that this traditional formula are mainly functioned to convey directive, expressive, and representative functions, and seems not specifically be used to express commisive, question, and let alone declaration functions. Declarative functions are exploited to convey command, advice, and prohibition. There are various strategies used by the speakers in exploiting wangsalan. Those are implicit, direct, indirect, literal, and expressed strategies. Explicit, non-literal, and implied strategies are rarely used because they will unease the addressee comprehend the intention formula.

Key terms: wangsalan, traditional formula, communicative function, and deliverance strategy

Full source: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DvyYtyeDEOdD3vjZsKNNLTwWwoBeTtuq/edit

Analysis Model in Critical Pragmatics

 Analysis Model in Critical Pragmatics 

Ramdan Sukmawan, Dadang Suganda , Nani Darmayanti, Muhamad Adji

Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia

Email: ramdan18001@mail.unpad.ac.id

ABSTRACT

Pragmatics examines human language use. The study in pragmatics continues to develop by involving other fields of science, that Cummings (2005) mentions pragmatics in multidisciplinary scope. The study is not only limited to micropragmatics but also in macropragmatics that concerns to language use in sociocultural (Chen, 2020, p. 10). The studies of pragmatics keep exploring in teaching academic writing (Harwood & Hadley, 2004), ESL of classroom talk in a High School (Talmy, 2010), and discursive power and dominance (Melefa et al., 2014). The studies are called critical pragmatics. The critical pragmatics studies try to investigate language use not only in what it is but in what language it is as well. The paper aims at describing analysis models in critical pragmatics. The research methodology applied descriptive qualitative to comprehend the use of analysis models. Analysis model in critical pragmatics applied analysis approach which combined pragmatics study and other study, they are (1) pragmatics, critical pragmatics, and critical in English for Academic Purposes (EAP), (2) conversation analysis (CA) and Fairclough critical discourse analysis (CDA), (3) analysis critical pragmatics in the framework of Fairclough critical discourse analysis (CDA), (4) pragmatics and critical discourse analysis (CDA), (5) critical discourse analysis (CDA) and pragmatics, and (6) critical issues in language use in works of pragmatic phenomena to find ideology. 

Keywords: analysis, critical pragmatics, models

https://conference.inapra.org/index.php/conference/article/view/17