71 LIST OF RESEARCH ON IMPOLITENESS IN CYBERPRAGMATICS

1. Expression of Emotion As Impoliteness Markers In Instagram Comments Section In Indonesia: A Pragmatic Study , D. Suganda, S. Yuliawati, Nani Darmayanti, 2022. The paper analyzes impoliteness markers in Indonesian Instagram comments using pragmatic theories. It focuses on swear words, examining their form, reference, and impact.

1. Indonesian Netizens’ Impoliteness Toward Government Loudspeaker Policies: A Cyberpragmatic Approach, Tri Santoso, Endang Nurhayati, Margana, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2025. The paper analyzes impoliteness in Indonesian netizens' comments on a government policy, using a cyberpragmatic approach and Leech's impoliteness theory. It identifies deviations from maxims of wisdom, politeness, agreement, and sympathy.
2. Politeness and Impoliteness Strategies in Lecturer-Student Communication Within Cyberpragmatic Chats, Faizal Risdianto, M. Machfudz, 2023. The paper perfectly matches the criteria for impoliteness and cyberpragmatics. It analyzes impoliteness principles in online communication and uses a cyberpragmatic approach to study online interactions. It is somewhat relevant to the Indonesian language criterion as it examines communication in both English and Indonesian.
3. Impoliteness Strategy for Cyberbullying in Indonesian on Instagram Social Media, Subyantoro, Suseno, Zuliyanti, 2023. The paper analyzes impoliteness strategies in Indonesian cyberbullying speech on Instagram, identifying positive and negative impoliteness types. While relevant to cyberpragmatics through its discussion of impoliteness, it doesn't explicitly apply specific pragmatic frameworks.
4. HATE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA: INDONESIAN NETIZENS’ HATE COMMENTS OF PRESIDENTIAL TALK SHOWS ON YOUTUBE, Ismail Tahir, Muhammad Gana Fajar Ramadhan 2024. This paper analyzes hate speech in Indonesian netizens' comments on YouTube, focusing on impoliteness strategies. It identifies early warning as the most common type of hate comment. While it touches on digital communication and (im)politeness analysis, it does not explicitly apply specific pragmatic theories.
5. (Im)Politeness and (In)Civility in Social Media: The Case of Pronouns and Propositions in Twitter Comments, Aisah, 2020. This paper analyzes impoliteness and incivility in Indonesian Twitter comments using Culpeper's impoliteness theory and Papacharissi's incivility theory. It examines how pronouns and propositions are used to attack President Jokowi's positive face, finding that informal pronouns like "Lu/Loe" are considered impolite.
6. Impoliteness in Indonesian Language Hate Speech on Social Media Contained in the Instagram Account, Subyantoro Subyantoro, S. Apriyanto, 2020. This paper analyzes hate speech using impoliteness theory, identifying strategies like positive and negative impoliteness. The study focuses on Indonesian language hate speech found in Instagram comments. While it does discuss social media, it does not explicitly apply pragmatic theories.
7. Analysis Model of Impolite Indonesian Language Use, 2021. The paper analyzes impolite language use in Indonesian on social media, focusing on factors like context, power, diction, and ethical speech acts. It aims to develop a model for analyzing impoliteness. While it mentions social media, it does not explicitly apply pragmatic theories.
8. IMPOLITENESS STRATEGY IN INSTAGRAM CYBERBULLYING: A CASE STUDY OF JENNIFER DUNN POSTED BY @LAMBE_TURAH, Fani Indrawan, 2018. The paper perfectly matches the impoliteness and Indonesian language criteria, as it analyzes cyberbullying comments on an Indonesian Instagram account using Culpeper's impoliteness strategies. It is somewhat relevant to cyberpragmatics, as it applies a pragmatic theory (impoliteness strategies) to online communication.
9. Impoliteness Manoeuvres and Its Motives in Indonesia Lawyers Club Talk Show, Dita Sukmawati Putri, 2021. The paper directly studies impoliteness strategies in the Indonesian Lawyers Club talk show, using a pragmatic approach to analyze dialogues. It identifies four impoliteness strategies and three reasons for their use. While it uses pragmatics, it is not in the context of cyber communication.
10. INTERPRETING IMPOLITENESS IN INDONESIAN LANGUAGE: THE CASE OF SHORT STORY “SORE”, Miftahulkhairah Anwar, 2020. The paper analyzes impoliteness in an Indonesian short story, focusing on utterances that violate politeness maxims. It also relates impoliteness to power dynamics in online interactions. While not explicitly using cyberpragmatics, it touches on the impact of digital technology on language politeness.
11. The Impoliteness of Indonesian Language on Instagram Potentially toward Conflict of Ethnic, Religion, Race and Inter-group, Miftahulkhairah Anwar, •2020. The paper studies impoliteness in the Indonesian language on Instagram, focusing on ethnic, religious, racial, and inter-group conflicts. It uses a qualitative descriptive method to analyze data collected from Instagram.
12. Impoliteness of Directive Speech Acts in Online Indonesian Language Learning, Laili Etika Rahmawati, 2021. The paper perfectly matches the criteria for impoliteness and Indonesian language, as it specifically analyzes impoliteness in directive speech acts within the context of online Indonesian language learning. It is somewhat relevant to cyberpragmatics because it studies online communication, but it does not explicitly apply pragmatic theories or frameworks.
13. Language Impoliteness in Memes Contesting the 2024 Presidential Election in Indonesia. Miftahulkhairah Anwar, 2024.The paper perfectly matches the impoliteness and Indonesian language criteria, as it examines linguistic impoliteness in memes related to the 2024 Indonesian presidential election. It is somewhat relevant to cyberpragmatics because it discusses memes as a form of online communication, but does not explicitly apply pragmatic theories.
14. Linguistic Politeness Analysis of Indonesia’s Prominent YouTube Influencers. Rizmadina Amalia Shalekhah, 2020. The paper analyzes linguistic impoliteness in Indonesian YouTube content, finding that insults are common and YouTubers often deviate from politeness maxims for humor. It also aims to develop politeness models for content creators. While the paper focuses on YouTube, a popular online platform, it does not explicitly apply pragmatic theories.
15. Indonesian Netizens' Emotive Language in Responding to YouTube Posts: Cyberpragmatics Study, Agung Pramujiono, 2023. The paper analyzes Indonesian netizens' emotive language on YouTube using a cyberpragmatic approach. It addresses impoliteness by referencing Indonesia's low ranking in the Digital Civility Index.
16. Impoliteness of Language Prohibition in Public Spaces and Its Implementation in Indonesian Language Learning, Rahayu Duwi Rohmah,2022. The paper studies impoliteness, focusing on rude, threatening, and insulting language in public spaces and its psychological impact. It also identifies forms of impoliteness in language prohibition. The study focuses on the Indonesian language, specifically examining impoliteness in language prohibition within public spaces and its application in Indonesian language learning. While the paper discusses impoliteness and language use in public spaces, it does not explicitly apply pragmatic theories or focus on online communication, making it only somewhat relevant to cyberpragmatics.
17. PROBLEMS IN MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY: FROM LANGUAGE POLITENESS TO HATE SPEECH. Rahmadsyah Rangkuti, 2018. The paper directly addresses impoliteness and hate speech, and it focuses on the Indonesian language. It also mentions applying politeness theory to anticipate hate speech. The paper is somewhat relevant to cyberpragmatics as it mentions the era of information technology, but it does not explicitly apply pragmatic theories to online communication.
18. Impoliteness in the Talk Show Catatan Demokrasi on YouTube TvOne, Kusnul Khotimah, 2023. This paper analyzes impoliteness strategies in the Indonesian talk show "Catatan Demokrasi" on YouTube, focusing on the bald on record strategy. While the study examines online communication, it does so through the lens of a specific talk show rather than a broader cyberpragmatic framework.
19. IMPOLITENESS OF COLLEGE STUDENT SHORT MESSAGE SERVICE TOWARD THE LECTURER (KETIDAKSANTUNAN DALAM PESAN SINGKAT MAHASISWA KEPADA DOSEN) S. M. Widya Fhitri, 2018. The paper perfectly matches the criteria for impoliteness and Indonesian language, as it analyzes impoliteness strategies in student-lecturer SMS communication in Indonesian. It is somewhat relevant to cyberpragmatics because it analyzes utterances in short message services.
20. Politeness in Expressive Speech Acts: A Cyber Pragmatics Approach, Famawati Fatmawati, 2024. The paper analyzes impoliteness in online comments using a cyberpragmatics approach. It focuses on how politeness maxims are violated in expressive speech acts on social media, specifically Instagram comments.
21. Pondering a Global BIPA: Politeness and Impoliteness in Verbal Interactions, Jumanto Jumanto, 2020. This paper directly discusses impoliteness in Indonesian verbal interactions, including rude and awkward situations. It also touches on politeness, camaraderie, distant language, close language, code-switching, and code-mixing within the Indonesian interpersonal context.
22. Ketriaditisan Konteks Pragmatik Tuturan Tidak Santun: Perspektif Kultur Spesifik, K. Rahardi, 2020. The paper perfectly discusses impoliteness in the Indonesian language. It analyzes types of pragmatic contexts related to impolite utterances, such as pretense, association, and taboos. The research uses observation and interview techniques to gather data.
23. Investigating the pragmatic meaning of the smiley emoticon on Whatsapp groups: a cyberpragmatics perspective, Rahardi, 2022. The paper is perfectly relevant to both Indonesian language and cyberpragmatics. It focuses on pragmatic elements in Indonesia and uses a cyberpragmatics perspective to study emoticons on WhatsApp. It is somewhat relevant to impoliteness, questioning if online politeness is the same as conventional politeness.
24. Negative Impoliteness and Reconstruction of Identity: Cyberpragmatics Analysis of Palestinian Conflict News Comments on Arab Youtube Channel, Faisol, 2021. The paper perfectly aligns with the 'Impoliteness' and 'Cyberpragmatics' criteria. It focuses on negative impoliteness in YouTube comments and uses a cyberpragmatics analysis framework. It is not relevant to the 'Indonesian Language' criterion.
25. Ketidaksantunan Berbahasa Mahasiswa dalam Proses Perkuliahan (Studi pada Program Studi Tadris Bahasa Indonesia UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu), Randi Randi, 2023. The paper analyzes impoliteness in Indonesian language used by students, focusing on violations of politeness maxims during lectures.
26. Impoliteness in EFL Complaints: Exploring its Intentions and Motivating Factors, Agus Wijayanto, 2018.The paper directly studies impoliteness, focusing on intentions and motivations behind its use by Indonesian EFL learners in complaints. The study elicits intentions directly from Indonesian EFL learners.
27. Impoliteness in EFL: Foreign Language Learners’ Complaining Behaviors Across Social Distance and Status Levels, Agus Wijayanto, 2017.The paper directly studies impoliteness, specifically in the context of Indonesian EFL learners. The study uses Indonesian participants in Central Java.
28. A Map of Students' Language Impoliteness: A Phenomenological Study, Kartini Kartini, 2024. The paper focuses on language impoliteness among students in Indonesia, using Culpeper's impoliteness strategy to analyze students' speech. It identifies three politeness violation strategies: direct, positive, and negative politeness violation.
29. Students’ E-complaints on the Promises and Pitfalls of Blended Learning: A Socio-Pragmatic Analysis, Justin Banguis, 2023. The paper is perfectly relevant to impoliteness and cyberpragmatics. It analyzes impoliteness strategies in students' e-complaints using a socio-pragmatic approach, examining violations of politeness strategies. It is not relevant to the Indonesian language, as the study focuses on complaints related to blended learning in the Philippines.
30. Face Attack Online: Unpacking Conflicts in Multimodal Group Chats, Fan Cao, 2024. The paper perfectly aligns with the 'Impoliteness' criterion, focusing on face attacks and impolite multimodal discourse in online settings. It also perfectly fits the 'Cyberpragmatics' criterion by applying pragmatic theories to online communication, specifically analyzing impoliteness in multimodal languages. The paper does not focus on the Indonesian language.
31. Sociopragmatic Analysis of Filipino Celebrities’ Posts and Fans’ Comments, Russel J. Aporbo, World Journal of English Language, 2023.The paper is perfectly relevant to impoliteness and cyberpragmatics. It analyzes hostile fan comments using impoliteness theory and applies pragmatic theories to online communication. It is not relevant to the Indonesian language.
32. Divine impoliteness: How Arabs negotiate Islamic moral order on Twitter, N. Zidjaly 2019. The paper is perfectly relevant to impoliteness as it examines impoliteness-oriented discourse on Arabic Twitter. It is also perfectly relevant to cyberpragmatics, focusing on how interactants use (im)politeness in digital contexts. It is not relevant to the Indonesian language.
33. STUDENTS 'LANGUAGE LEVELS IN COST CUTTATES, TANGERANG, BANTEN ENVIRONMENT, Jatut Yoga Prameswari, 2020. The paper directly addresses impoliteness among students and aims to find solutions to this issue. It also focuses on the Indonesian language and culture, particularly concerning politeness norms. However, it does not apply any specific pragmatic theories or frameworks to online communication.
34. Towards a Character Language: A Probability in Language Use, Jumanto , 2014, The paper directly discusses impoliteness in the Indonesian language. It also touches on politeness and camaraderie, and how these concepts are elaborated in the Indonesian context, including examples of rude situations.
35. Interlanguage impoliteness in criticism by the English learners from Javanese background over social status and distance, Eko Suwignyo The paper analyzes impoliteness in criticism, focusing on how it manifests across different social statuses and distances, using strategies like bald-on-record impoliteness. While the paper focuses on English language learners with Javanese backgrounds, it touches on how cultural context influences the perception of impoliteness, particularly through intonation. The paper mentions criticism in the digital world, making it somewhat relevant to cyberpragmatics, although it does not explicitly apply pragmatic theories to online communication.
36. REQUEST STRATEGIES IN INDONESIAN: AN ANALYSIS OF POLITENESS PHENOMENA IN TEXT MESSAGES,, 2018. The paper is perfectly relevant to the Indonesian language criterion because it focuses on how Indonesian is used in text messages. It is also perfectly relevant to cyberpragmatics as it applies pragmatic theories to the study of online communication, specifically text messages. It is not relevant to impoliteness.
37. The Shifts of Conventional Context Element Aspects: Towards a Cyberpragmatics Perspective, Rahardi, 2020. The paper is perfectly relevant to cyberpragmatics, as it aims to describe the shifts of conventional context elements to a virtual external context from a cyberpragmatics perspective. It is somewhat relevant to impoliteness, mentioning linguistic impoliteness. It is also somewhat relevant to the Indonesian language, mentioning pragmatic development in Indonesia.
38. Impoliteness Strategies and Impolite Responses to Swearing Utterances at Javanese Slapstick Shows, Rudi Agus Hartanto, 2023. the paper perfectly matches the impoliteness criterion, as it directly analyzes impoliteness strategies and responses to swearing. It is somewhat relevant to the Indonesian language criterion because it focuses on Javanese slapstick shows. It is also somewhat relevant to cyberpragmatics, employing a pragmatic approach to analyze speech within a specific context.
39. KONTEKS PRAGMATIK DALAM PERSPEKTIF CYBERPRAGMATICS, Kunjana Rahardi The paper is perfectly relevant to Cyberpragmatics, defining it as a transdisciplinary field involving language, pragmatics, technology, media, and the internet. It is also perfectly relevant to the Indonesian Language criterion, as the researcher uses their knowledge as a native speaker of Indonesian. It is not relevant to Impoliteness.
40. Indonesian Cyberbullying Issues: The Impoliteness in Communication, Nadhirah Muthi'ah, Umar Mono, 2022. Discusses cyberbullying cases and motives, including negative comments and mocking, which aligns with impoliteness. The data is from Indonesian celebrity Instagram accounts, making it somewhat relevant to the Indonesian language criterion. The paper does not explicitly apply pragmatic theories.
41. Linguistic Impoliteness in the Sociopragmatic Perspective, Kunjana Rahardi, 2017The paper is perfectly relevant to impoliteness, focusing on its pragmatic manifestations. It is somewhat relevant to the Indonesian language, as it studies impoliteness in culture-specific backgrounds, as indicated by a citation.
42. Evaluating Impoliteness in L2 : A Study of Pragmatic Competence of Indonesian EFL Teacher Trainees, Agus Wijayanto, 2019. The paper directly studies the evaluation of impoliteness by Indonesian EFL learners, focusing on how the length of English study affects their comprehension, especially of off-record impoliteness. While the study involves Indonesian learners, it does not focus on the Indonesian language itself, but rather on their English pragmatic competence. The paper does not discuss online communication.
43. PRAGMATIC PHENOMENA CONSTELLATION IN SPECIFIC CULTURE DIMENSION LANGUAGE STUDY, R. Rahardi, 2017The paper directly discusses language impoliteness as a pragmatic phenomenon, including definitions and perspectives from various researchers. It also mentions Javanese terms related to 'face loss', which is relevant to Indonesian language, but the paper does not focus on Indonesian language in general.
44. IMPOLITENESS IN ONLINE DISCOURSE: ANALYSIS OF READER COMMENTS ON SERBIAN NEWS SITE, Ema Živković Nikolić,2024. The paper perfectly matches the impoliteness criterion, focusing on its manifestation in Serbian news site comments. It is somewhat relevant to cyberpragmatics, as it uses Culpeper's model of impoliteness strategies to analyze online discourse. It is not relevant to the Indonesian language.
45. Impoliteness, Politeness and Mock Impoliteness in Naturally Occurring Data, Ayad Hammood Ahmed, 2024. The paper focuses on impoliteness, especially in Arabic and English. It uses a postmodern discursive approach. However, it does not focus on online communication or the Indonesian language.
46. Linguistic Impoliteness and Interpersonal Positioning in Nigerian Online Political Forum, Rotimi Taiwo,  The paper directly studies impoliteness in online political forums, finding bald-on-record and negative impoliteness to be predominant. It also explores the connection between interactional positioning and impoliteness, which is somewhat relevant to cyberpragmatics.
47. “You Have No Idea What You are Talking About!” From e-disagreement to e-impoliteness in two online Angouri, 2010. The paper directly studies intentional impoliteness in online communication. It also analyzes impoliteness in the context of Computer Mediated Communication (CMC), which is somewhat relevant to cyberpragmatics, as it examines how impoliteness is expressed online.
48. The YouTubification of Politics, Impoliteness and Polarization, Blitvich, 2010. The paper analyzes impoliteness in YouTube comments related to the 2008 US elections, linking it to polarization. It also touches on cyberpragmatics by analyzing online discussions, but does not explicitly apply pragmatic theories.
49. An Investigative Study on Impoliteness Pragmatics in Kinship Conversation during Chinese New Year, Ge Wang, 2023. Discusses impoliteness in family conversations during Chinese New Year. Uses interpersonal pragmatics to analyze chatting discourse, but focuses on face-to-face communication rather than online interactions.   
50. Analysis of Mock Impoliteness and Its Pragmatic Functions: Taking Crosstalks in CCTV’s Spring Festival Gala from 1983 to 2023 as an Example, Qingchen Geng, 2023 .The paper analyzes mock impoliteness strategies like joking and teasing, and their pragmatic functions. While the study focuses on Chinese crosstalk, it suggests future research could explore online chatting interactions. The paper does not focus on the Indonesian language.
51. Impoliteness and Computer-Mediated Discourse, S. Anurudu, 2020. The paper directly addresses impoliteness in online comments, focusing on political articles in Nigerian newspapers and identifying three levels of impoliteness. It also touches on the emergence of a new form of English in Computer Mediated Discourse, where members generally adhere to syntax and semantics.
52. Linguistic Impoliteness Strategies in Sina Weibo Comments, Wenjun Zhong, 2018. The paper perfectly matches the impoliteness criterion, as it focuses on impoliteness strategies in online communication. It is somewhat relevant to cyberpragmatics because it applies Culpeper's impoliteness strategies to the online context of Sina Weibo comments. It is not relevant to the Indonesian language criterion.,
53. The landscape of impoliteness research, Marta Dynel, The paper directly addresses impoliteness research, surveying theoretical and methodological problems, topics of investigation, and discourse domains. It also touches on cyberpragmatics by mentioning phenomena promoted by computer-mediated communication, such as flaming and trolling.
54. Positive politeness strategies during online learning: A cyberpragmatic study, Hari Kusmanto, P. Widodo, 2022. The paper uses a cyberpragmatic approach to analyze politeness strategies in online learning. It also mentions analyzing speech with polite or impolite meaning. However, the paper does not focus on the Indonesian language.
55. Identity, impoliteness and integration in online immigration discourse, A. Bączkowska, 2020. The paper directly analyzes impoliteness strategies in online communication. It also touches on how impoliteness plays a role in negotiating cultural and community norms online, which is related to cyberpragmatics, but the focus is not primarily on pragmatic theories.
56. Interpersonal pragmatics and its link to (im)politeness research, Miriam A. Locher, 2015. The paper directly addresses impoliteness research. It also touches on multidisciplinary approaches to impoliteness, which can be relevant to cyberpragmatics if applied to online communication..
57. Identity and impoliteness in computer-mediated reader responses. Shiv R. Upadhyay, 2010. The paper directly studies impoliteness in online reader responses. It also touches on cyberpragmatics by analyzing online communication, but it does not explicitly apply pragmatic theories or frameworks.
58. Impoliteness in reader comments on Japanese online news sites, Xiangdong Liu, 2017, This paper directly studies impoliteness in online communication, focusing on factors that trigger it in Japanese CMC. It also touches on cyberpragmatics by considering how online environments affect communication styles, though it doesn't explicitly apply pragmatic theories.
59. PHATIC TALKS OF JAVANESE WOMEN IN INTERNET-MEDIATED-COMMUNICATION: A CYBERPRAGMATICS PERSPECTIVE,Yuli Widiana, 2022. The paper uses a cyberpragmatics approach to analyze phatic talks. It also mentions Javanese cultural norms, which are related to Indonesian culture, but the paper focuses on Javanese women and their language use.
60. Japanese BBS Websites as Online Communities: (Impoliteness Perspectives, Y. Nishimura, 2008. The paper directly discusses impoliteness in online communities, specifically on Japanese BBS websites, and how it coexists with a sense of community. It also uses computer-mediated discourse analysis to analyze linguistic features, making it somewhat relevant to cyberpragmatics.
61. Phatic emoji of Javanese netizens in social media: a cyberpragmatics perspective on a creative communicative strategy, Yuli Widiana, 2024.The paper uses a cyberpragmatics framework to analyze emoji use in WhatsApp groups. While the study focuses on Javanese netizens, it does not explicitly focus on the Indonesian language itself, but rather on a specific cultural group within Indonesia. The paper does not discuss impoliteness.
62. Politeness in E-mail of Konferensi Linguistik Universitas Airlangga (KLUA) 2018 Presenters: Cyberpragmatics Review,Nicolas Sartini, 2018. The paper perfectly applies cyberpragmatics to email communication, analyzing politeness strategies. It is somewhat relevant to the Indonesian language because it studies emails related to a conference held at Universitas Airlangga. It is not relevant to impoliteness.
63. POLITENESS IN DOMESTIC VERBAL VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN IN INDONESIA, Ike Revita, 2020.The paper is perfectly relevant to the Indonesian language criterion, as it analyzes politeness in domestic verbal violence in Indonesia, with data collected in Sumatera Barat. It is somewhat relevant to impoliteness, mentioning that threatening someone's face is impoliteness. It is not relevant to cyberpragmatics.
64. Hate Speech Classification in Indonesian Language Tweets by Using Convolutional Neural Network, Ayu Nadia Taradhita,Ketut Gede Darma Putra, Journal of ICT Research and Applications,2021. The paper focuses on hate speech classification in Indonesian tweets, making it perfectly relevant to the "Indonesian Language" criterion. It is somewhat relevant to "Impoliteness" as it mentions impolite utterances in hate comments. It does not discuss pragmatic theories.
65. A Pragmatic Analysis of Impoliteness in Selected Ghanaian Social Interactions,Dorcas Oteng Acheampong The paper directly investigates impoliteness strategies in Ghanaian conversations, identifying types and linguistic representations. It uses a pragmatic approach to analyze natural conversations, focusing on impoliteness in social interactions.
66. Politeness and Impoliteness in Javanese Speech Levels, Farida Nuryantiningsih, 2018. The paper directly discusses impoliteness in language, defining it as speech acts violating social norms. It also mentions politeness in Javanese speech levels. However, it does not focus on Indonesian language or cyberpragmatics.
67. Politeness Maxim In the film ” Laskar Pelangi”, Budiati Budiati The paper analyzes politeness maxims in the movie "Laskar Pelangi" with an Indonesian cultural background. It touches on impoliteness by discussing how implicature is used to avoid it.
68. Implications of Impoliteness Strategies on Interpersonal Relations: An Analysis of The Dirty Picture, Dr. Jitendra Kumar Yadav 2022.The paper directly discusses impoliteness and its impact on interpersonal relations, using Culpeper's framework to analyze impoliteness strategies in a film. It finds that impoliteness can cause conflict and is used to exercise power.
69. Impoliteness in a cultural context, S. Mills 2009.The paper is about impoliteness. It is cited as a source defining impoliteness as threatening one's face.
70. Politeness Strategies of The Panders in Women Trafficking, Ike Revita, 2017. The paper is perfectly relevant to the Indonesian language criterion as it includes an abstract in Indonesian. It is not relevant to impoliteness or cyberpragmatics.